Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? : a Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules /
This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal frame...
محفوظ في:
| مؤلفون آخرون: | , |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | الكتروني كتاب الكتروني |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing : Imprint : Springer,
2019.
|
| سلاسل: | Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ;
74. |
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | EBSCOhost |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
جدول المحتويات:
- Part I: Comparative Perspectives
- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective
- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective
- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth
- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective
- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective
- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore
- Part II: Exclusionary Rules
- quo vadis
- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview
- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence
- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives
- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole?
- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules
- Is It Time for Change?